Helen Wong MBE is the author of Cyber Security: Law and Guidance.
This is included in our Cyber Law Online Service.
The most common misconception about cyber security and the law that organisations often encounter is the belief that compliance with legal requirements alone is sufficient to ensure robust cyber security. Many organisations mistakenly assume that meeting the minimum standards set by regulations or frameworks like GDPR or NIS Directive equates to comprehensive protection against cyber threats. In reality, cyber security requires a proactive, multi-layered approach that goes beyond mere legal compliance to include continuous risk assessment, incident response planning, and employee training.
These factors, among others, have significantly impacted the cyber security strategies of organisations across the UK and the EU.
Generally speaking, banning the use of generative AI can be a cautious initial step for organisations concerned about potential risks. This approach allows them to assess and understand the implications, such as data privacy concerns, intellectual property issues, and security vulnerabilities, without exposing the organisation to unknown threats.
However, instead of a total ban, a more nuanced approach might involve:
These steps can help organisations balance innovation with security and compliance concerns.
Potential challenges could include:
Addressing these challenges will require a comprehensive, proactive approach to cyber security, involving continuous risk assessment, investment in security technologies, and ongoing training and awareness programs for employees.